The Modern Alternative

Zyro vs. Optimizely

Why modern growth teams are switching from legacy enterprise bloat to Zyro's zero-flicker performance.

Zyro
VS
Optimizely
Feature Zyro Optimizely
Speed Impact (Latency) How much it slows down your site.
< 50ms
100-300ms
Visual Editor Flicker Does the original content flash before the test?
Zero (Anti-Flicker)
Frequent
Statistical Model How we calculate winners.
Bayesian + Bandit
Frequentist (Slow)
Revenue Attribution Can it track full-path ROI?
Native Integration
Requires Add-ons
Starting Price Monthly cost for startups.
$0 / Free Tier
~$35,000 / Year
Setup Time
2 Minutes
Weeks (Sales Call)

1. Performance: Speed vs. Bloat

Optimizely was built in 2010. Its "synchronous" script blocks your website from loading until it decides what variation to show. This hurts your Core Web Vitals and SEO.

Zyro runs on a modern, edge-cached architecture. Our script loads asynchronously and uses "Optimistic Hiding" to ensure zero flicker without slowing down your Largest Contentful Paint (LCP).

2. The "Peeking" Problem

Optimizely uses traditional Frequentist statistics. This means you have to decide on a sample size upfront (e.g., 50,000 visitors) and you cannot look at the results until it finishes, or you invalidate the math.

Zyro uses Sequential Bayesian statistics and Multi-Armed Bandit algorithms. You can peek at results daily. If a variation is losing money, our Bandit algorithm automatically cuts traffic to it, saving you thousands in lost revenue.

Ready to modernize?

Import your existing experiments and start testing in minutes. No sales calls required.

Start For Free